Police Department Survey Scenario: You are offered the opportunity to start your own experimental police force. The mayor and county council members will fund and support all of your requests. There are five conditions:You must be willing meet with a communication-skills coach for a 3-hr session each week (for one year) in support of the following —
3) You must have one private three-hour meeting each week with each of your senior commanders and another weekly three-hour meeting with them together as a group. And once a month you must attend their weekly three-hour meetings with their subordinates.4) All spouses in your new department must agree to attend a three-hour support group once every two weeks (all together at the same location) for the purpose of clearing/acknowledging and support-skills coaching. You will be coached on how to train their elected facilitator. 5) Each person who comes with you, to include new people you hire, must agree to the following three agreements. Each member in your new department must agree to be willing to tell the truth to everyone at all times.
You may invite as many officers/personnel as you wish from your present department to fill all the required positions. Your present department will receive ample funding to replace all personnel you take. [ top | home | overview | faqs | about us | privacy | registration ]
All fields required
The survey uses Huggins' Email Form Script West Point Code of Honor The present unwritten police department code supports rookies and veteran officers in sometimes remaining silent if they notice a fellow officer committing an infraction of the rules. Anyone breaking this "code of silence," by bringing an infraction to the attention of the perpetrator or a senior officer, is branded a troublemaker, or a snitch (a Serpico), and is shunned. The West Point Code of Honor requires cadets to confront anyone breaking any rule, including academy staff officers, and communicate in support of the rule-breaker reporting themselves. If the rule-breaker refuses, the observing cadet communicates that they have no choice but to report them. If the observing cadet fails to report the rule-breaker, both the cadet and the rule-breaker are dismissed from the academy. For example: If in your new police department a subordinate found out that another officer was cheating on his/her spouse, the subordinate would ask the officer to stop doing it and to report the deceit to their spouse and to you. If the cheating officer refused then the subordinate would tell them they have no choice but to report it to you. Most likely in your present department, if you know that an officer is cheating on his/her spouse you are expected to keep it to yourself, to mind your "own" business, thereby allowing (supporting) the cheater to interact with the public in a condition of out-integrity. Put another way. Your chief has unconsciously communicated, nonverbally, that cheating is permissible, the implied communication being, "...just don't let me find out about it." Usually within a week a rookie has opted to compromise his/her integrity and silently condone another's perpetration (padded mileage, incomplete/inaccurate reports, etc.). No officer ever truly recovers from this initial disappointing shock, of thinking law enforcement professionals operate from integrity. For more about military academy code of honor
[ top | home | overview | faqs | about us | privacy | registration ] |