|
|
|
|
| |
|
Spouse's
Anonymous Survey:
(v 6.15)
Read the following scenario and then answer
the ten-item survey
(you may do the survey whether or not you do the tutorial).
Scenario:
Your spouse is offered the
opportunity to start his/her own
experimental police department.
You both will have unlimited free
access to a communication-skills coach for the first two years.
The mayor and council members
will fund and support all requests. If you
don't want your spouse to accept the offer, he/she must abide by
your wishes.
There are however five (5) conditions:
1) The experimental police force must be based upon the
West Point Code
of Honor.
2) You
and your spouse must be willing to be coached on how to manifest
your stated intentions.
Some examples: Reports
turned in on time, completely, accurately and
legibly. Health goals and standards met
with zero exceptions. All problems and dissatisfactions
communicated to one's face (zero complaining or gossiping behind
anyone's back).
3) You must be willing to be coached on how to
support your spouse in creating a team
absolutely committed to getting the job done exactly as you
both envision.
4) You must be willing to be
coached on how to have an organization that does not require a union.
Everyone will be so trusted and trustworthy, and so totally committed to serving
each other as family, that all issues will consistently be handled
internally through to mutual satisfaction.
5) You must have one three-hour meeting each week with
the spouses of your spouse's senior officers and another weekly three-hour meeting with
all the spouses within your spouse's new department (you will be
guided/coached on how to chair
these meetings).
You and your spouse may invite as many officers/personnel from
the present
department to fill all the required positions as you wish. The
former department will receive ample funding to replace all
personnel who come with you and your spouse.
Each person who comes with you and your spouse, to include newly
hired people, must agree to the following three
agreements.
- Everyone, all
officers and spouses, must agree to be willing
to tell the truth to everyone at all times.
- Everyone must agree to
keep all of his or her agreements.
- Everyone must agree to
be willing to communicate openly and honestly—zero thoughts withheld from each
other, zero deceits, at home or on the job. In other words, zero
badmouthing and no sting operations.
[
top |
home |
faqs
|
overview
|
about us |
registration
|
privacy
]
|
survey
Ten-Item Survey:
Use the drop-down arrow to make a selection.
Use the "enter your choice" field to enter numbers such as 1 & 3, 20% etc.
|
| |
[
top |
home |
faqs
|
overview
|
about us |
registration
|
privacy
]
Code
West Point Code of Honor
Background: The present unwritten police department code supports rookies
and veteran officers alike in sometimes remaining silent if they
notice a fellow officer committing an infraction of the rules.
Anyone breaking this "code of silence," by bringing an infraction
to the attention of the perpetrator or a senior officer, is
branded a troublemaker or a snitch (a Serpico) and is shunned.
Even before graduating from the police academy a potential
police officer has compromised his/her integrity irreparably.
Most dump complaints and badmouth about others to their spouse
because they don't dare say what's on their mind to their cadre.
The illusion of belonging to an inspiring, honest, organization
is gone. For many it's a profound shock and disappointment.
For example:
Most every police officer knows at last one fellow
officer who is cheating (deceiving) their spouse and they
vote silently, for reasons, to support it. Their integrity
and that of
the department is compromised.
Most every officer knows at least one fellow officer who
is padding their time or mileage and they vote silently to
deceive their chief. Their integrity and that of the department is
compromised.
Most every officer knows at least one fellow officer who
should not be a police officer, yet day after day they
remain silent supporting this person to
continue to perpetrate their fraud on the community. Quite
often the misfit is given a desk job to get them away from
the public as though the person's character will change or
not affect the integrity of the department as much.
Most every officer knows at least one fellow officer who
is an active alcoholic who has not reported their addiction
to the department. Day after day they allow/support this person
to effect their suicidal behaviors on the public. Their
integrity and that of the department is compromised.
Most every police officer's spouse knows at least one
officer who is violating a department rule and they vote
daily to look the other way, thereby supporting the
perpetrator, for reasons. The integrity of their
relationship and the department is compromised. They and
their spouse have unconsciously sabotaged their chief and
deceived the community.
The people in the above examples have lost their ability to choose to go
straight even though they know that there is a correlation
between their integrity and the crime rate (the integrity of
the citizens they are supposed to be serving). It is not
their fault. They just have not been trained to tell the
truth. In this regard it is the responsibility of the police
chief who him/herself is out integrity. They have created
fear in their relationship with everyone and so everyone
hides one or two thoughts/things from the chief, for fear
of.... There is not one police chief, in any department in
the world, who has learned how to be a safe space for the
truth to be told. Such a department and community would be
the training capital of the world's police cadre.
The West Point Code of Honor:
The West Point Code of Honor requires every cadet to confront
anyone breaking any rule, including the academy cadre and staff officers,
and communicate in support of the rule-breaker reporting
themselves. If the rule-breaker refuses, the observing cadet
communicates that they have no choice but to report them. If the
observing cadet fails to report the rule-breaker, both the cadet
and the rule-breaker are dismissed from the academy.
In other words, if in your spouse's new police department
you found out that an officer was cheating on
his/her spouse, you, not your spouse, would ask the officer to
stop doing it and ask them to report the deceit to their
boss. If the
cheating officer refused then you would tell
them you have no choice but to report it to their boss. In
your new organization, a police officer would not be fired
or even punished for an infraction. The only reason an
officer would be asked to leave is if they refused to talk
about a problem. In this way your new department would
differ from any military academy. For more about this
subject read,
About Military Academy Scandals.
Back
[
top |
home |
faqs
|
overview
|
about us |
registration
|
privacy
] |
|
|
|
 |
| >
Contact Us |
|
Use the
Contact Us form to
send us feedback or to ask a question. |
| > Site Map |
Site
Map is an index of
the pages of this web site.
Press
Search
to find a word or topic on this web site. |

|
 |